Hizen swords were a domain enterprise: the Nabeshima sent Tadayoshi to study under Umetada Myōju around 1596, then built a licensed school around him. Nine generations carried its famously consistent konuka-hada work into the Meiji era.
NihontoWatchNihontoWatchSummary This blade was signed by Harima Daijō Fujiwara Tadakuni (播磨大掾藤原忠国). The maker’s name Tadakuni lasted three generations, and we believe the first generation forged it, judging from the signature. The first-gen Tadakuni was the second son of Hirosada, an apprentice of the first-gen Tadayoshi, one of the most famous swordsmiths during the early Edo period. His older brother was Kunihiro (国広). Tadakuni, Hirosada (his father), and Kunihiro (his older brother) were all students of the first-gen Tadayoshi. The first-gen Tadakuni was born in the 9th year of the Keicho era (1604). His birth name was Hashimoto Rokuro Zaemon (橋本六郎左衛門). He was especially active in sword-forging during the Keian-Manji era (1648-1661: Early Edo Period). Tadakuni originally signed Hironori (広則) when he started his career. Then, he changed it to Tadakuni when he received an official Harima Daijō (播磨大掾) rank in the 11th year of the Kanei era (1634) when he was 31 years old. Later on, he was promoted to Harima no Kami (播磨守). The emperor gave the title of Daijō and Kami to those who were excellent at sword-forging. During the Shohou era (1644-1648), he started to serve Ogi clan, a branch of Nabeshima clan, which was the headquarters of the Saga domain during the Edo period. The head of the Ogi clan was Nabeshima Motoshige, the son of Nabeshima Katsushige, the feudal lord of Saga domain. It is said that Motoshige was also a master of various sorts of martial arts, including swordsmanship. We assume there was much demand among high-class Samurai to order swords forged by Tadakuni because this clan actively pursued martial arts. He kept forging swords for the Ogi clan for more than 40 years, and he retired and passed his title and school to his son around 1676-1677. There was a record of him forging a blade in collaboration with his son after he officially retired. He died at the age of 88 in the 4th year of the Genroku era (1691). Fujiwara Tadakuni and other swordsmiths in the Hizen province worked under the auspices of Nabeshima clan. The swordsmiths in Hizen province were able to produce beautiful Jigane-patterned blades, also known as Hizen To, using and mixing carbon steel made in Netherland. You can see the beautiful Jigane, which is famous for blades made in Hizen province. Swords forged by Tadakuni are also renowned among Japanese sword collectors because of his exquisite craftsmanship and history. Hizen Province The first-gen Tadayoshi (His master) The first-gen Tadayoshi was born and raised in the Saga domain. In 1596, under the domain’s order, he went to Kyoto to learn the sword-forging technique from Umetada Myojyu (埋忠明寿), one of the greatest swordsmiths in the early Edo period. He improved his craftsmanship and returned to the Saga domain two years later (1598). The first head of the Nabeshima clan, Nabeshima Katsushige, appreciated the work of the first-gen Tadayoshi very much. Then, Katsushige appointed him as his Okakaekaji, a swordsmith who exclusively forged swords for a specific domain or clan. And Tadayoshi started to stay near Saga castle, which is the headquarter of the Nabeshima clan. And, he founded Hizen Tadayoshi school, which trained more than 100 swordsmiths during the Edo period. Tadakuni is one of them. It is appraised as a Tokubetsu Hozon Token (特別保存刀剣) issued by NBTHK (Nihon Bijutsu Touken Hozon Kyokai: 日本美術刀剣保存協会). *Please keep in mind that there are a couple of kitae kizu on this blade. Fuchi-Kashira The Unryu (雲竜) theme is engraved on this Fuchi-Kashira. This design is a combination of dragons and clouds. Clouds bring blessed rain and snow, and their movements significantly affect the day’s weather. Due to its supernatural power, a theory says that gods, spirits, and dragons dwell in the clouds. In Japan, there is a belief that dragons are worshipped as water gods. Since rice cultivation has flourished in this country, people always treat water as an essential resource. We imagine some people wished for a plentiful harvest in this combination. From such a religious aspect, we could infer that dragon designs were familiar to people. Initially, dragons were imaginary creatures found in ancient foreign traditions and myths. Furthermore, it is regarded as a symbolic beast of auspicious signs. Its body is likened to nine animals: antlers are deer, the head is a camel, eyes are demons, the neck is a snake, the belly is the Mizuchi (蛟, a mythical animal in Japan that looks like a snake and has a horn and four legs), scales are fish, claws are falcons, palms are tigers and ears are cows. A dragon was thought to reign at the top of all animals because of its odd appearance. Based on our experiences, there are lots of dragon-designed sword mountings. It shows that many Samurai warriors favored this dignified beast motif. Tsuka and Menuki The theme of this menuki is a leopard (豹, hyo). In Japan, leopards were once believed to be female tigers until a certain point in the Edo period. During that time, leopards were sometimes exhibited in misemono (見世物, public spectacles), where imported and exotic animals were displayed for entertainment. These animals were often regarded as auspicious creatures, and although leopards were identified as tigers, it was believed that simply seeing them could bring good fortune. Tsuba and Habaki The shape of this Tsuba is called 四ツ木瓜 (Yotsu-mokko). Also, the Inome (猪の目, boar’s eyes) patterns are designed on each edge. The Inome pattern has been used since ancient times and looks similar to the heart mark. Some people believed the Inome design would work as an amulet to protect them from evil spirits or fire. Also, it is said it would bring good luck. Saya The surface of this Saya is decorated with the Ishime-Ji (石目地). Its base was hit by Tagane (鏨, chisel for metalworking), and it makes a rough surface that seems stone. *Please note that there are signs of restoration and some damages. If you would like more detailed information about the condition, please feel free to contact us. Authentication Paper They authenticated the blade on December 1st in the 7th year of Reiwa (2025). They appraised it as Tokubetsu Hozon Touken, the blade especially worth preserving for Japanese society.
Offered by Samurai Museum
This piece has sold
Get an email when a new Hizen Tadakuni piece hits the market.
Hizen Tadayoshi (Saga / Ogi) · Hizen · around 1648-1652
Fujishiro Jo saku · Tōken Taikan top 21%
7 pieces on the market now
Tadakuni is the first-generation Hizen smith who signed Harima Daijō, and later Harima no Kami, Fujiwara Tadakuni. His earliest name was Hironori; in Kan'ei 11 (1634), at the age of thirty-seven, he received the title Harima Daijō and changed his name to Tadakuni, the earliest title-bearing work on record being dated Kan'ei 13. He was a pupil of the first-generation Tadayoshi, the founder of the Hizen school, and the son of Sōemon Yoshiie of the Hashimoto family; since he shared the founder's Hashimoto surname, the published sources judge him likely of the same lineage, and note that he received his title considerably earlier than the second-generation Ōmi Daijō Tadahiro of the main house. He was retained by the Ogi domain, one of the three Nabeshima branch houses of Saga, and was active as an Ogi-domain smith. In old age he took the tonsure under the name Kyūtetsu, and his work extends into the Tenna era.
The published sources read his hand in two manners and call him highly skilled in both, but they place his true strength in the flamboyant midare. His is a gunome-chōji and chōji-midare, the temper often broad, the clove heads at times round, mixing in gunome, angular elements and yahazu-like forms with scattered tobiyaki. Long ashi enter frequently, with yō, the nioi deep and ko-nie well adhering. Above all it is the sunagashi that names him. The sources say of one blade that sunagashi runs vigorously through the ha, and that among his school he is the one in whom it is most conspicuous: 「刃中に砂流しがさかんにかかり」[[c:1]], 「一派の中でも最もそれが目立つ」[[c:2]]. With it run kinsuji, and the nioiguchi is bright and clear. The other recurring note of his clove work is the reach of its ashi: in midareba, the published record holds, his distinctive feature is a chōji with long ashi, 「足長丁子に特色がある」[[c:3]].
The jigane beneath both his manners is the tightly forged Hizen ko-itame with ji-nie, the steel the school is known for. On his finest pieces it becomes the dust-fine ji-nie laid thickly with chikei entering, the ji bright and clear, and several blades carry the slight nagare toward the edge that the sources note in his late suguha work. Over that jigane his second face is the calm one. He tempers a naka-suguha, at times a broad suguha, deep in nioi, ashi and yō entering well, with fine kinsuji and sunagashi and at the habuchi a nijūba-like effect. The published sources record him plainly as skilled in both registers, 「直刃, 乱刃ともに上手」[[c:4]], and on one late suguha katana they observe that, against his usual habit, here the sunagashi is not especially prominent, 「さまで砂流しが目立たず」[[c:5]], the whole finished in a quiet, restrained dekiguchi that shows this comparatively small body of straight-temper work. The bōshi in both manners runs straight to a ko-maru, frequently with hakikake.
His record divides less by period than by manner, though the dated pieces let the late years be read. The Harima Daijō signature carries the body of his work; the Harima no Kami signature, used after his promotion and running through the Kanbun, Enpō and into the Tenna years, marks the later blades. One Enpō 2 (1674) katana takes as its principal tone a varied large ō-notare-midare mixed with chōji-like elements and tobiyaki, deep in nie and nioi, which the sources call a manner brimming with vigorous spirit. On his most ambitious clove work the temper widens a further degree into an ō-chōji-midare with ara-nie and even slight muneyaki, so high-tempered, the published commentary remarks, as to be rare among his blades, and they ask whether the first-generation Tadakuni was here aiming at the old Ichimonji: 「古作の一文字あたりを狙ったものであろうか」[[c:6]]. The same record places the difficulty of his oeuvre squarely on the table. Because the second generation was likewise appointed Harima no Kami, the first and second are hard to tell apart, and the sources note a view that much now called second-generation work may in fact be the first's.
What sets Tadakuni apart within his own school is exactly what the judges name. His jigane and his bright nioiguchi are the shared Hizen inheritance, the komenuka-fine ko-itame and the clear temper that every Tadayoshi-line smith owes to the founder. His own signature is laid over that inheritance: the long-ashi chōji-midare and, within it, the sunagashi that runs more conspicuously in his ha than in any other hand of the school. On one katana the published sources read the workmanship as at first glance recalling Naoe Shizu, 「一見直江志津などの風を見せて上手である」[[c:7]], the Yamato-tinged streaming temper a measure of how far his midareba reaches from the calm Hizen suguha standard. He stands as the school's most accomplished maker of the flamboyant clove temper, the branch hand who carried the Hizen jigane into a brighter, more active hamon than the main line pursued.
For the collector he is a signed and well-documented Shintō name whose work survives entirely at the Jūyō level. Fujishiro grades him Jō saku. He has no National Treasures and no Important Cultural Properties; his record runs instead through the Jūyō Tōken ranks, where his katana appear across many sessions and the published sources repeatedly call them representative or typical examples by this smith, both ji and ha clear and bright. One they single out as 「傑出の一口であり, 典型作でもある」[[c:8]], an outstanding and typical piece of his midare work. Several carry Yamano Ka'emon cutting-test inscriptions in gold inlay, documents of the edge as well as the hand, and a number bear chrysanthemum and crab-peony crests on the tang. The thirty-some designated blades on record are held in private and long-kept collections, their owners largely unrecorded, so a signed Harima Daijō or Harima no Kami Tadakuni is not beyond reach in the way a National Treasure is; it comes to the serious collector from time to time, with patience, and a fully realized flamboyant chōji example, in which his sunagashi runs at its most vigorous, is a thing to be sought out when it appears.
Where Tadakuni stands among comparable artisans: across all of nihontō, and within tradition, era, and period. The tiers (Foremost · Leading · Major · Notable) weigh official designations from the NBTHK and Japan's Agency for Cultural Affairs, together with historical honors of lasting repute such as the Sansaku and Meibutsu-chō.
Select a lens to see how it's measured.
Shinto · Hizen
105 pieces on the market now
The Hizen school began with a single domain commission. In Keicho 1 (1596) the Nabeshima of Hizen ordered Hashimoto Shinzaemon, the smith who would sign Tadayoshi, up to Kyoto with the carver Munenaga; there he entered the gate of Umetada Myoju and studied forging while Munenaga learned the chisel. The two returned to the province in Keicho 3 (1598), and Tadayoshi settled in the castle town below Saga, where under the domain's patronage the line grew into the dominant sword-making house of Kyushu. His own work runs from Keicho 5 (1600) to his death in Kan'ei 9 (1632); in Genna 10 (1624) he received the court title Musashi Daijo, changed his name to Tadahiro, and shifted his clan name from Minamoto to Fujiwara, so that the late Musashi Daijo blades are the founder under a second name. From him the house became a true generational institution: his son the second-generation Omi Daijo Tadahiro carried it forward as its most prolific hand, the third-generation Mutsu no Kami Tadayoshi returned its highest finish, and a Tosa no Kami branch took the founder's signature when he set it aside. Around this main line grew a circle of disciples and collateral hands, the waki-Hizen or Soba-Hizen smiths, several of them, like Yoshiie and Hironori, working as daisaku substitute makers whose own signed pieces are therefore scarce. The school's signature is its steel. Over a ko-itame forged so tightly it shows no slackness, fine ji-nie gathers in minute particles until the surface takes on the rice-bran konuka-hada (also written komenuka-hada) that no other school produces, fine chikei entering throughout and the ji notably clear and bright.
The orthodox temper laid upon it is a chu-suguha or hiro-suguha, sometimes tinged with a shallow notare and ko-gunome, the nioiguchi deep with finely clustered ko-nie and tightened to a bright clarity, the boshi running straight to a quiet ko-maru. The founder aimed this suguha toward the Rai school yet departed from it, his nioiguchi tighter and his forging carrying more vigor; the third generation refined it to what the published sources call the strongest and most precise hand of the first three generations. Against that calm register the house also worked a showier one, the Hizen choji-midare mixing gunome, long ashi, kinsuji and sunagashi, a manner the published sources already find more often in the founder's late Musashi Daijo work than in his Tadayoshi years, and one the second generation made his own. The branches pushed further from the suguha standard: Tadakuni of the Ogi domain ran sunagashi more conspicuously than any other Hizen hand and reached toward old Ichimonji in his o-choji; Masahiro and Yukihiro favored a flamboyant long-ashi choji over the calm main line; and the Iyo no Jo Munetsugu line worked apart in the Soshu-den, building a midareba on notare with a pointed togariba and a jihada that tends to stand and tone slightly blackish. A collector seeks Hizen-to first for that steel, and reads it the same way the appraiser does: a bright suguha lying over a clear, tight konuka-hada identifies the school before the signature is consulted, and the quiet ko-maru boshi on the ura-signed tang confirms the main-line practice. Generation and branch are then told within that frame, the third generation's powerful sugata recalling not his father but his grandfather, the waki-Hizen hands set apart by their irregular temper, their sujikai file marks and a sashi-ura signature, the Munetsugu line by its Soshu togari. The main line, made in real numbers across so long a span, reaches the market more readily than any Kamakura master, so a papered example is within reach of a patient collector, while the founder's own work and the finest konuka-suguha of the third generation come to open hands only from time to time. Provenance runs back through the house the school served, blades recorded to Nabeshima Katsushige and Nabeshima Naomoto and passing onward to the Owari Tokugawa, the Satake and the Imperial families; documentary inscriptions sharpen the picture further, a Myoju soemei attesting the founder's discipleship, Umetada carving adding flowers to brocade on his late blades, and the gold-inlaid cutting tests of Yamano Kanjuro and Yamano Ka'emon, rare on Hizen work, naming the edge as well as the hand. Learn more →
| Smith | Era | Designated |
|---|---|---|
| Tadayoshi忠吉 | 1596-1632 | 155 |
| Tadayoshi忠吉 | 1660-1686 | 61 |
| Tadahiro忠廣 | 1633-1693 | 133 |
| Masahiro正廣 | 1624-1655 | 30 |
| Tadakuni忠國 | 1648-1652 | 32 |
Hizen: a domain enterprise
Hizen swords were a domain enterprise: the Nabeshima sent Tadayoshi to study under Umetada Myōju around 1596, then built a licensed school around him. Nine generations carried its famously consistent konuka-hada work into the Meiji era.
A Hozon-certified blade judged to show notably superior workmanship and a better state of preservation. The bar is higher: re-tempered blades and most unsigned Muromachi/Edo works are excluded.
The NBTHK (Nihon Bijutsu Tōken Hozon Kyōkai, the Society for the Preservation of Japanese Art Swords) is a public-interest incorporated foundation founded in 1948 and supervised by Japan’s Agency for Cultural Affairs (Bunkachō); it is based at the Japanese Sword Museum in Tokyo. Its expert panels physically examine each submitted work (shinsa) and issue a certificate (kanteishō) ranking it by artistic and historical merit. NBTHK papers are the most widely recognized standard of authentication for Japanese swords and fittings.
NBTHK official siteReturns/exchanges limited to defects caused by shipping (except willful misconduct or gross negligence by the company); customers must contact within 72 hours of receiving the product.
Certificate reading — 銘 播磨大掾藤原忠国